Then will Venizelos sell the Salamis to another nation? Since Greece ain't part of the Washington Naval Treaty, it could sell to any nation that wanted a new warship (Netherlands the most likely, for exemple)
Regarding migrants, I think we may see a significant White Russian population. Moreover in OTL 1921, if I remember correctly, 30k Armenians migrated there.I have some questions about Constantinople... How will be fare Constantinople, in this TL? What 'd is the city economy compared to OTL? Would be attracting migrants or rather 'expelling' their workforce in seek work in Greece? Also, the hypothetical migrants 'd is only Greeks workers or 'd attracts to Turks work migrants, too?
Then will Venizelos sell the Salamis to another nation? Since Greece ain't part of the Washington Naval Treaty, it could sell to any nation that wanted a new warship (Netherlands the most likely, for exemple)
I have some questions about Constantinople... How will be fare Constantinople, in this TL? What 'd is the city economy compared to OTL? Would be attracting migrants or rather 'expelling' their workforce in seek work in Greece? Also, the hypothetical migrants 'd is only Greeks workers or 'd attracts to Turks work migrants, too?
Regarding migrants, I think we may see a significant White Russian population. Moreover in OTL 1921, if I remember correctly, 30k Armenians migrated there.
When it comes to economy, I think the author can tell us who controls the city's policy and if there are tarrifs to Greece and Turkey. If there are tarrifs, it is possible to see an economy based on services and logistics. If there are no tarrifs, we may very well see industrial development. In any case, I think the industrial development will be smaller than OTL where it was the major industrial center servicing a turkish market of more than 13 million people.
It is possible but difficult to see happening. Protestants/Unionists were more evenly distributed across NI than they are today when a lot have migrated to the big towns. Back in the 1920s agriculture hasn't mechanised, the railways and canals are still large employers as are fishing and coastal shipping. Omagh and Strabane are still Protestant majority towns for instance. The demographic shift is more down to Protestants/Unionists adopting family planning two generations earlier than Catholics/Nationalists dominating whole regions of NI. Downpatrick is a Catholic town for instance but with a Protestant hinterland. Newry and Derry have Catholic majority populations but Protestants still make up around a third of both towns populations and own virtually all the major businesses and Belfast wants to hold on to the Mourne mountains in order to build reservoirs for Belfast and Lisburn. Shedding South Armagh is a possibility, Stormont never really wanted it but the Southern Irish weren't willing to swap it for Lifford (basically because a small industrial town paid more taxes than a larger region of hill farms). But don't forget that OTL NI has already shed Monaghan, Cavan and Donegal. They have held onto the majority of territories that they think they can hold. 1920 population distribution is not as evenly divided as 2020 where repartition would be vaguely feasible.First and foremost, I am excited to see an ATL Ireland led by Collins. @ShortsBelfast this is your queue: where there any thoughts for mutual population transfers in OTL?
The turkish loan is one of the most important butterflies of the story. In OTL kemalist Turkey managed to bet through the interwar with incredibly little borrowing. Now the Sivas government is between the proverbial devil and the deep blue sea.
a) First and foremost, they have to repay their share of the ottoman public debt by starting with a much smaller economy. The author stated that Turkey has 2/3 of its OTL GDP. In my honest opinion, if we also take into account the loss of the service and industry sector of Constantinople along with its port revenues, I find the figure a bit generous. What is left to the Sivas government has a great potential but with exception of the Black Sea coast and Cilicia is extremely underdeveloped, lagging decades behind the lost regions.
b) Regardless the question of GDP, in order to pay the ottoman debt and the new loan, Turkey needs to export products in order to get hard currency. TTL Turkey has retained perhaps 50% of its OTL exports. Therefore the hard currency that they can earn is halved, while the debt is higher.
c) In OTL Kemal had the luxury of focusing his 5-year industrial programs on heavy and war industry. Now the (limited) pre-war light industry that focused on consumer goods is gone. Gone are most of the textile factories, flour mills, distilleries and tanneries. First and foremost, the new Turkey needs to develop this sector. Otherwise, if they have to import even more consumer finished goods, they will become a failed state in a matter of years, as the hard currency outflow will be devastating.
d) There is a way to repay more easily the debt and industrialize: tapping the huge natural and human resources of Anatolia. There is one problem though: they need even more hard currency to import machinery, build railroads etc. This is a loop, as they cannot go back to capitulations and surrender newly won sovereignty to the hated western corporations. Frankly, I don't see how they can expand the railroad network in the same scale as in OTL. Certainly Sivas will be connected to the network, most probably Erzurum also. Any huge OTL expansion seems unlikely.
Therefore, I think the turkish economic conundrum doesn't have a solution, not at least before a catastrophic global event (WW2). For example, if they want to buy one or two 10,000 ton pocket battleships, they will have to not build even a single mile of additional railway beyond the Sivas-Erzerum connections. Or they won't be able to afford modern machinery for war-related industry. In general, come 1939, the turkish military and infrastructure will be in singificantly worse material situation compared to OTL.
Apologies to the OP but I was summoned.@ShortsBelfast thanks a lot for the illuminating reply!
If I may be so bold, I would like to tag @Rinasoir even though he doesnt seem to be a reader of this timeline, to ask him what policies would Collins promote? I am talking of course for a scenario that doesnt involve advice and investment from a German/Dubliner magnate.
The Irish didn't like Churchill huh? The more ya learn.That is provided the butterflies in the story don't see someone like Churchill as PM, in which case things would go bad fast.
Other way around.The Irish didn't like Churchill huh? The more ya learn.
Oh well, the only butterfly regarding Ireland is that Collins survive the ambush.It's early in the morning, and I'm not going through an entire thread to make 100% sure of everything that is going on
Great update! What might Benny plan with Metaxas...?!
Also, Michael Collins surviving and staying in politics and that election, does it mean the Irish Civil War was averted??
Super excited to see Michael Collins surviving! Eamon De Valera's Ireland was not a very happy place I hear....
My logic is that even if it is not likely, it still was all the rage so to speak in the early 1920s. So Collins being interested on how it is working out is logical... thus butterflying the ambush that got him.First and foremost, I am excited to see an ATL Ireland led by Collins. @ShortsBelfast this is your queue: where there any thoughts for mutual population transfers in OTL?
It may be generous but when in doubt go for the figure least convenient for the Greeks. Does wonders in helping keep things plausible.The turkish loan is one of the most important butterflies of the story. In OTL kemalist Turkey managed to bet through the interwar with incredibly little borrowing. Now the Sivas government is between the proverbial devil and the deep blue sea.
a) First and foremost, they have to repay their share of the ottoman public debt by starting with a much smaller economy. The author stated that Turkey has 2/3 of its OTL GDP. In my honest opinion, if we also take into account the loss of the service and industry sector of Constantinople along with its port revenues, I find the figure a bit generous. What is left to the Sivas government has a great potential but with exception of the Black Sea coast and Cilicia is extremely underdeveloped, lagging decades behind the lost regions.
In OTL Turkey took one loan of $10 million from Sweden at 6.5% and one from the Soviet Union free of interest for $8 million. Then in 1938 it took a 16 million pound loan from Britain, 6 million for arms and 10 million for industrial goods, the British were markedly difficult about it, and a 150 million reichsmarks loan from Germany on markedly better terms. Add to that the Ottoman public debt, that was 140 million in 1914, and apparently the Ottoman share of that was 84.6 million by 1933. In the same period Turkey was supposedly paying 7 million lira a year on the public debt, by other accounts it was 13-18% of the annual budget which fell to 5% by 1939. Of course Turkish budget was 210 million in 1930 and 400 million in 1940, so 13% is ~27 million in 1930 and 5% is ~20 million in 1939.b) Regardless the question of GDP, in order to pay the ottoman debt and the new loan, Turkey needs to export products in order to get hard currency. TTL Turkey has retained perhaps 50% of its OTL exports. Therefore the hard currency that they can earn is halved, while the debt is higher.
c) In OTL Kemal had the luxury of focusing his 5-year industrial programs on heavy and war industry. Now the (limited) pre-war light industry that focused on consumer goods is gone. Gone are most of the textile factories, flour mills, distilleries and tanneries. First and foremost, the new Turkey needs to develop this sector. Otherwise, if they have to import even more consumer finished goods, they will become a failed state in a matter of years, as the hard currency outflow will be devastating.
How? For a solution... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_concession TTL the grand national assembly could well be more amenable...d) There is a way to repay more easily the debt and industrialize: tapping the huge natural and human resources of Anatolia. There is one problem though: they need even more hard currency to import machinery, build railroads etc. This is a loop, as they cannot go back to capitulations and surrender newly won sovereignty to the hated western corporations. Frankly, I don't see how they can expand the railroad network in the same scale as in OTL. Certainly Sivas will be connected to the network, most probably Erzurum also. Any huge OTL expansion seems unlikely.
There is one obvious answer that shall remain unnamed and another that is clearing, Germany under Schlacht was offering to Turkey twice the actual market price in the clearing agreements between the two countries. Of course this also means Turkey will be even more dependent on clearing agreements than OTL and particularly trade with Germany come the 1930s...Therefore, I think the turkish economic conundrum doesn't have a solution, not at least before a catastrophic global event (WW2). For example, if they want to buy one or two 10,000 ton pocket battleships, they will have to not build even a single mile of additional railway beyond the Sivas-Erzerum connections. Or they won't be able to afford modern machinery for war-related industry. In general, come 1939, the turkish military and infrastructure will be in singificantly worse material situation compared to OTL.
As a note the active officer corps is dominated by the Venizelists. Only a limited number of the Royalists removed in 1917 was reinstated in 1921 and the current deal effectively accepts that the rest will never return to service, unless there is a war of course. With every passing year it will be all the more difficult to bring them back to service.@ShortsBelfast thanks a lot for the illuminating reply!
If I may be so bold, I would like to tag @Rinasoir even though he doesnt seem to be a reader of this timeline, to ask him what policies would Collins promote? I am talking of course for a scenario that doesnt involve advice and investment from a German/Dubliner magnate.
Back on the topic of greek politics, it seems a coup is on the way with the blessings of Metaxas. Thats good. Time to prune the officer corps of its more reactionary members. Now that the majority of royalists have been reinstated, only the most extremists are out of the picture, so it is doomed to fail. Moreover, what a great way to discredit Metaxas: even if Benito puts him as a Quislig figure in WW2, he will have already lost credibility even among the royalists.
On the bright side, based on his own writing he apparently was pretty fond of Collins personally. To quote him from volume 4 of the World CrisisOther way around.
Churchill was not fond of the Irish at all.
Or.. near psycho driving a car at those speeds on those roads.He was already near Psychiko